In Part 1 of this series comparing the Roman and Mongol Empires, we took a brief look at the rise and fall of these two great empires. In Part 2, we compare the two and see which one was greater. LandsDuring its peak, the Mongol Empire occupied twice as much as land as the Roman Empire. It is known as the largest contiguous empire in history (the later British empire was larger, but not contiguous). This was partially due to Geography – the Mongols were very adept horse warriors, and the wide sweeping plains of Central Asia enhanced their mobility. They did less well in mountainous regions such as Korea and northern India. The Romans had to deal with starting out on a peninsula, had to build a navy as well as a land military force, and had fairly well-armed opponents, making it much harder for them to expand to the same reach. Thus, by sheer size alone, the Mongols win hands down. TimeThe Roman Empire, at least the East side, lasted over a thousand years (1500 if you count from the founding of the Republic), while the Mongol Empire grew and fell relatively quickly in about a century and a half. Even the less-successful East side of the Roman Empire still lasted an impressive 400-500 years. The Romans take the cake here. Peace and TradeBoth Empires had created a Pax (peace) across their empire which allowed trade to flourish. Both built a system of roads across their empire which allowed rapid communication. Goods from one end of the empire could reach the other easily, and sometimes quite far beyond. The Monglian routes were fast – some estimate messages could be carried as fast as 200km a day. They also formed a sort of insurance system where if merchants were attacked they could get reimbursed from the imperial treasury. The main reasons for the Pax Mongolica’s decline were the outbreak of the Black Death and the fracturing of the Empire due to political and religious differences. Rome’s peace, on the other hand, was less effective. While the Pax Romana indicated a period without civil unrest, the Empire was rarely at peace with its neighbors and often had to quell revolts. While the Mongol Peace lasted only about half the time of the Roman Empire’s, it was much more effective. Thus, the Mongols win here. PopulationBecause world population changed through time and the empires were not direct contemporaries, it is more fair to compare them based on percentage or proportion of the world’s population under their control rather than absolute numbers. The Romans controlled nearly 55 million people for a whopping 1/6th to 1/4th of the world’s population. The Mongols controlled 110 million people for slightly more than 25% of the world’s population. Thus, here we are going to give it to the Mongols, though not by much. WeaponsWhile both empires used many different weapons in the course of carving out their lands, we’re going to focus on the swords they used. The Mongol Empire used weapons similar to Chinese Dao – single-sided swords that were easy to use from horseback. As the Empire reached farther west, they adopted Persian weapons such as the Scimitar. The Romans, on the other hand, used Gladius – double-sided swords about 40-60cm in length early on. Later, they also adopted the use of Spatha – larger swords which were closer to a metre in length. There’s no clear superiority here, as the weapons were used in different situations and for different purposes. They excelled at what they were meant to. So, here we’ll give them a tie. ConclusionWith a score of 4-2, the Mongols win here. They controlled more land and people, built a more effective peace, and used their weapons to great effect. The Romans were less effective, though still great by any measure. from https://www.bladespro.co.uk/blogs/news/roman-empire-vs-the-mongol-empire-part-2
0 Comments
Besides Hua Mulan, there have been many other Chinese warrior women throughout history. Today, we are going to take a look at 3 very special women. Fu HaoOne of the earliest female Chinese leaders we know of, Fu Hao was, until recently, fairly unknown due to most records of her accomplishments not surviving due to her life preceding the invention of paper. However, with her tomb recently unearthed, we have began to understand just how interesting a woman she really was. One of Shang Dynasty King Wu Ding’s 64 political wives, she rose to become a wife in truth, the second in rank of only 3. While she had a child through difficulty, Prince Jie, it seems her primary role was as a military leader. She commanded a retinue of 13 thousand soldiers with at least two generals serving under her, making her the most powerful Shang leader of the time. Her people had had been fighting a group known as the Tu-Fang for generations. She managed to end the generational conflict in a single decisive battle. She also fought numerous engagments with other nearby nations. It seems she was particularly revered by the emperor – after her death, he would offer ritual sacrifices at her burial place, asking her spirit for help in battle. Strangely she was buried away from the royal family across a river, Thankfully for us, this means her tomb is the only royal Shang dynasty burial place that has survived unlooted, letting us learn about her through oracle bone inscriptions as well as the many personal items filling her tomb. Xun GuanXun Guan was possibly the youngest female Chinese military leader. Her father, the governor of Xiangyang, was attacked by one of his officials in a coup attempt . The only way to survive was if a small force could break through the siege and commandeer reinforcements from a nearby city. The only one with a plan the governor thought could work was Xun Guan – his 13-year old daughter. The young but very brave leader managed to lead a sneak attack at night that got them through enemy lines, allowing them to make it to Pingnam, where she requested help. Her father’s ally General Shi Lan was willing, but unsure if he had enough troops to turn the battle. He suggested she write a letter to a nearby General Zhou Fang in another city and request more troops. She did, and together the 3 leaders and their forces headed back to save her father. Her father recognized the opportunity, and, with a two-pronged attack, the 3 leaders managed to destroy the siege and route the attackers. Ching ShihConsidered the most successful pirate in all of history, she started her life as a lowly prostitute on a floating Chinese brothel. A successful pirate Cheng I took notice of her and married her. Apparently well-aware of her valuable non-sexual attributes (some wager the real reason for their marriage), he entered into a contract with her that gave her 50% ownership and control over all his endeavors. Shih and Cheng adopted one son Cheung Po Tsai for the purposes of legal succession and Shih bore two others. Cheng and Shih used soft and hard power to form an alliance with other pirates, forming the Red Flag Fleet. When Cheng I died, Shih acted quickly to gain the loyalty of the other captains and fill the leadership vacuum. Working together, Shih and her stepson Cheung managed quick success, which apparently led to them becoming lovers. In time, they managed to assemble a fleet of several hundred ships with crew numbering in the tens of thousands. They were so successful that, in their heyday, they fought against the British, Portuguese, and Qing. Easily winning against the Qing dynasty ships, they struggled against and were finally forced to surrender to the Portuguese navy. That same year, the Qing dynasty gave an amnesty to all the pirates (minus a few hundred to set an example), and Ching Shih and Cheung Po Tsai accepted it. Asking for their legal status as mother and child to be dissolved, which was approved, they got married and had two children. She opened a brothel and lived to a ripe old age of 69, dying surrounded by family. from https://www.bladespro.co.uk/blogs/news/chinese-women-warriors Both the Roman and Mongol Empires were juggernauts of their times. With vast swaths of territory and tens of millions of conquered peoples living in their realms, these Empires would be unrivaled until the late British Empire. In Part 1 of this 2-part series, we explore, briefly, the rise and fall of these two great powers. In Part 2, we will compare and analyze them on several criteria. Roman EmpireTracing its roots to the 6th century BC with the founding of the Republic, the Roman Empire began humbly. Consisting of nothing more than the city of Rome and a few outlying towns, it gradually expanded until it began to reach beyond the Italian peninsula around the 3rd century BC. In the 2nd century BC, the Republic of Rome began to suffer internal discord while simultaneously beginning to rapidly expand its borders. This led to the need for a strong central command and, eventually, the first dictator Julius Caesar. Julius Caesar was assassinated in 44 BC. His adopted son Octavius and Marc Antony divided the Empire between them, then eventually attacked each other. Octavius won and was given the title of princeps, meaning “first citizen”, and the name Augustus in 27BC. Augustus was well-liked because he ended a century of turmoil and strife, and his rule began the start of what was called the Pax Romana, a 2-century long peace where the Empire flourished. As with all good things, this was not to last, and the Empire eventually fell into turmoil around 180 AD. After a century, Aurelian managed to stabilize the empire and Diocletian fully restored it. Rejecting the title of princeps, he became the first ruler to take the actual title of Emperor. Apparently happy with his deeds, he divided the empire into separate parts, each ruled by its own ruler, then abdicated the throne. This didn’t work, and it was up to Constantinian the Great to fix the mess. Constantinian established a second capital in the East called, appropriately enough, Constantinople. After a later ruler Theodosius I died, the Western side of the Empire began to disintegrate due to immigration and invasion problems from the Germanic peoples, and was basically gone after only a short century. The East side was much more successful and lasted for another thousand years before finally falling. Mongol EmpireCompared to the slow build up of the Roman Empire, the Mongol Empire hit like a lightning strike. The Mongols were disorganized nomadic tribes that usually couldn’t get along and were encouraged in their internal strife by their neighbors in order to keep them under control. That all changed, however, with the rise of Genghis Khan, who united the tribes in 1206 AD and set out to build himself an Empire. He moved quickly, taking over what is now Northern China, eastern Persia, and Ukraine. By his death, the Mongol Empire was twice the size of the Roman Empire at its peak. He died in 1227, a mere 21 years after his conquest began. Due to questions over the paternity of his oldest son, he was forced to name his third son Ogedei as his heir. Ogedei expanded the empire, incorporating southern China and southern Persia. He reached as far as Korea, though he did not succeed in annexing the peninsula, instead forced to rule it politically through marriage. He also invaded parts of India, though he eventually had to withdraw. After one of his sons died, the Empire lost part of southern China, but managed to expand northward into what is now Russia, taking the capitol Kiev. The Empire expanded into Europe, reaching as far as modern Poland before being halted by news of Ogedei’s death. Ogedei’s son Guyuk eventually took power, but the Empire was weakened by a period of division when Ogedei’s widow unsuccessfully tried to rule the Empire and one of the most powerful Mongol military leaders refused to recognize her. Guyuk tried to reduce corruption, expand, and maintain the empire. He was sickly and ill, and died during travel, so a man named Mongke became Emperor, marking a switch in power from Ogedei’s line to another son of Genghi’s line Tolui. Mongke sought to expand the Empire, but made some mistakes, allowing significant opposition and a halt to the Mongol’s advances for the first time. War and strife followed, and eventually a Mongol leader rose to power who succeeded in fully conquering all of China, founding the Yuan dynasty. While his and his descendants’ rule was weaker than those that had gone before, with much of the Mongol Empire being ruled independently by others who did little more than acknowledge the Yuan’s rule and send tribute. The Empire eventually began to collapse due to religious intolerance among its disparate parts, the Black Death, and corruption. Thus marked the end of the Pax Mogolica: a period of piece lasting around a 100 years with great economic growth and relative peace and safety from the Pacific Ocean to the Mediterranean. from https://www.bladespro.co.uk/blogs/news/roman-empire-vs-the-mongol-empire-part-1 The words “Longsword” and “Broadsword” are commonly used to describe different types of swords. However, their modern definitions are quite different to what they were historically. The LongswordThe word “longsword” originally (circa 11th century) referred to a one-handed sword with a long blade. Long, of course, is subjective, but for a long time, there were no definite criteria for being a longsword other than that they were longer than some other sword. This trend continued until around the 15th century, when we have documents that describe swords similar to today’s definition of a longsword – a hand-and-a-half double-edged sword with a simple cross hilt, its blade usually measuring around 1 metre in length. However, the ambiguous naming of the long sword continued up until the 17th century. The BroadswordSimilar to the longsword, a broadsword historically (15th century and earlier) meant a sword that carried a blade broader than a common reference sword of the time. In the 16th-17th centuries, mercenaries hired by Venice carried basket-hilted swords that could be either single-edged (backsword) or double-edged. In the 18th-19th centuries in Scotland, the highlanders used swords that would fit the modern definition - a basket-hilted one-handed sword with two edges and a medium-length cut-and-thrust blade. This definition has been carried down and is now commonly used in historical fencing clubs. However, as late as the 19th century in Hungary were used swords called longswords (but today would be called sabers), because they were broader than the popular dueling swords of the time (sword similar to rapiers). Interestingly enough, shortswords, or smallswords, at that time generally referred to a sword that was shorter or smaller than a rapier, which does not necessarily mean the swords were small – as rapiers had 76cm long blades. Colloquial UseSo, if modern definitions are defined mostly by historical fencing groups, why are they used so differently in common speech? Well, the answer for this, interestingly enough, seems to come from D&D and other similar games, when the creators of the games needed to differentiate many similar types of swords from one another for gameplay reasons. Thus, they arbitrarily named one a longsword and another a broadsword based on how they compared to other historical swords that were included. from https://www.bladespro.co.uk/blogs/news/longsword-vs-broadsword Few women have achieved the notoriety throughout their entire lifetime that Julie d'Aubigny acquired in just two short decades. Famous for her insatiable sexual appetite and martial prowess, two things that regularly got her into trouble, she would have perished early in life if not for her father’s close contacts with the king. Teenage DuelistJulie d'Aubigny was effectively raised as a man, the son of the secretary to Horse Master Louis de Lorraine-Guisea. Her father’s job was to train the court pages, and she was raised under his tutelage as well. From him, she learned dueling, horseback riding, dancing, and reading, among other traditionally “manly” skills. Her choice of men’s clothes reflected her upbringing. Her dress didn’t stop her from attracting the eye of the Count d'Armagnac, who took her as his mistress when she was only 14 years old. For some reason, the Count decided to marry her off to Sieur de Maupin, whom she stayed married to for life, though ne’er faithful. When her husband moved to the South of France, she stayed in Paris (possibly at the Count’s request), and began to engage in antics that would make the ears of the noble class ring. First, the very same year, she hooked up with an assistant fencing master who had similar proclivities as she. After he killed a man in a duel (dueling was illegal in Paris by the King’s edict), they had to flee. Making a living by singing duets and demonstrating their fencing skills, they traveled through the countryside. Because Julie’s fencing skills were so incredibly, she was occasionally accused of being a man pretending to be a woman. According to a story, she got so tired of this that, one day, she tore open her blouse in order to prove that she was indeed a woman. For people whose craving for excitement knows no bounds, loyalty doesn’t factor in very high, so it wasn’t long before she tired of her traveling lover and decided to try her luck with a woman. Her new choice’s parents were less-than-pleased with her decision and sent the woman away to a nunnery. Undeterred, Julie managed to enter the same convent by pretending to be an initiate, then arranged their escape by placing the corpse of a recently-deceased nun in her girlfriend’s room, setting it on fire, then fleeing during the chaos. This affair lasted only 3 months, but it was not without consequences. For her deed, Julie was charged with arson, kidnapping, body snatching, and failing to show up to court. Possibly because of the inability to comprehend bisexuality at the time (“Why would a woman run off with another woman? Only a man would do so.”), she was charged as a man, so the sentence was severe – death by fire. Opera SingerDuring her adventures trouping around the county, she had managed to attract the attention of some opera talent scouts who pushed for her to join the Paris Opera. She headed toward Paris but first had to first deal with the charges hanging over her head. Luckily for her, her father was able to contact the King and get the charges cleared. She joined the Opera, playing some very strong female parts, and her voice attracted renown. Of course, being Julie d'Aubigny, she couldn’t quite blend in with the other performers. At one ball, she publically kissed a woman, which attracted the attention of three men who dueled her. She won every duel. She had to flee Paris due to the anti-dueling laws, until she was once again able to obtain a royal pardon, with the King rationalizing that the laws only applied to men. Even during all this, she somehow found the time to seduce the then-governor of the Netherlands. Returning to the Opera, she challenged a man known for bothering female singers, and when he tried to refuse, she mugged him. Not wanting to admit to the embarrassment, he made up a story that he had been attacked, which she quickly refuted by producing a pocket watch she had taken from him. True Love And HeartbreakJulie was fated to die young. She fell for a mistress Marquise de Florensac, whose death after two years proved too much for the still-young Julie, who had finally found love at long last. Joining a convent for real this time, she lived there another few years until her death at the young age of 33. from https://www.bladespro.co.uk/blogs/news/the-notorious-opera-duelist-of-paris-julie-daubigny The Quest of A KingLegend has it that an ancient ruler of China, King Chu, once called the greatest swordsmith of the land to make him a few masterwork weapons. That man’s name was Master Ou Yezi. Ou heeded the King’s command and traveled far and wide, looking for a place in which he could make such weapons. He finally found a suitable place – one with plentiful iron for smithing, special water for quenching, and suitable stones for grinding. The name of the place was Lonqquan. There, Master Ou spent three years of labor, painstakingly crafting the blades the King wished for. In the end, he created three swords: Longyan, Tai’e, and Gongbu. The first sword, Longyuan, means “Dragon Abyss”, and was named such because its shape reminded the viewer of someone standing at the top of a tall cliff and looking down. The second sword, Tai’e, means “Great Mountains”, and was named so because its soul existed in the mountains where the sword was forged before being contained in the sword. The last, Gonbu, meant “Exquisite Cloth”, due to it feeling as smooth as silk when touched. The King was pleased with these swords, and Master Ou’s name has been revered among Chinese swordsmiths since that day. LongQuanNestled by the tallest mountain in the province, the town of Lonquan still holds much of its ancient beauty. Surrounded by forest and a nearby a river, this quiet town contains the top swordsmiths of China. Supposedly the water in the river has minerals that react with the sword during quenching to enhances its sharpness and resilience. Getting there is a journey – there are no airports or major transport hubs. Once there, one can visit the many swordsmithies in the area. Swordsmaking is a tradition handed down from master to apprentice that has been passed on for centuries. Unfortunately, this tradition is in danger as fewer apprentices choose to make swordsmithing their career due to the hard work and low pay, instead choosing to look elsewhere for job opportunities. The quality of Longquan swords is unmatched, with local smordsmiths having made swords for foreign leaders, movies, and for wealthy clients who can afford to pay for the months of work it can take to make just one high-quality sword. The swordsmithing of Lonqquan has been recognized as an Untangible Cultural Heritage of China. Fun FactsThe ancient name of Longquan is actually Longyuan (the same name as the first legendary sword made by Master Ou Yezi). Due to a later leader named Yuan, the name was changed out of respect and to avoid naming conflicts. The art of swordsmithing was originally imported into Japan from China. Now history has come full circle, with Chinese smiths having imported the knowledge from Japan for making Katana and other Samurai Swords. Our SwordsMany of our swords come from Lonquan, guaranteeing their high quality. It gives us pride to work with smiths from such a distinguished heritage. from https://www.bladespro.co.uk/blogs/news/swordmaking-legacy-longquan Few women have achieved the notoriety throughout their entire lifetime that Julie d'Aubigny acquired in just two short decades. Famous for her insatiable sexual appetite and martial prowess, two things that regularly got her into trouble, she would have perished early in life if not for her father’s close contacts with the king. Teenage DuelistJulie d'Aubigny was effectively raised as a man, the son of the secretary to Horse Master Louis de Lorraine-Guisea. Her father’s job was to train the court pages, and she was raised under his tutelage as well. From him, she learned dueling, horseback riding, dancing, and reading, among other traditionally “manly” skills. Her choice of men’s clothes reflected her upbringing. Her dress didn’t stop her from attracting the eye of the Count d'Armagnac, who took her as his mistress when she was only 14 years old. For some reason, the Count decided to marry her off to Sieur de Maupin, whom she stayed married to for life, though ne’er faithful. When her husband moved to the South of France, she stayed in Paris (possibly at the Count’s request), and began to engage in antics that would make the ears of the noble class ring. First, the very same year, she hooked up with an assistant fencing master who had similar proclivities as she. After he killed a man in a duel (dueling was illegal in Paris by the King’s edict), they had to flee. Making a living by singing duets and demonstrating their fencing skills, they traveled through the countryside. Because Julie’s fencing skills were so incredibly, she was occasionally accused of being a man pretending to be a woman. According to a story, she got so tired of this that, one day, she tore open her blouse in order to prove that she was indeed a woman. For people whose craving for excitement knows no bounds, loyalty doesn’t factor in very high, so it wasn’t long before she tired of her traveling lover and decided to try her luck with a woman. Her new choice’s parents were less-than-pleased with her decision and sent the woman away to a nunnery. Undeterred, Julie managed to enter the same convent by pretending to be an initiate, then arranged their escape by placing the corpse of a recently-deceased nun in her girlfriend’s room, setting it on fire, then fleeing during the chaos. This affair lasted only 3 months, but it was not without consequences. For her deed, Julie was charged with arson, kidnapping, body snatching, and failing to show up to court. Possibly because of the inability to comprehend bisexuality at the time (“Why would a woman run off with another woman? Only a man would do so.”), she was charged as a man, so the sentence was severe – death by fire. Opera SingerDuring her adventures trouping around the county, she had managed to attract the attention of some opera talent scouts who pushed for her to join the Paris Opera. She headed toward Paris but first had to first deal with the charges hanging over her head. Luckily for her, her father was able to contact the King and get the charges cleared. She joined the Opera, playing some very strong female parts, and her voice attracted renown. Of course, being Julie d'Aubigny, she couldn’t quite blend in with the other performers. At one ball, she publically kissed a woman, which attracted the attention of three men who dueled her. She won every duel. She had to flee Paris due to the anti-dueling laws, until she was once again able to obtain a royal pardon, with the King rationalizing that the laws only applied to men. Even during all this, she somehow found the time to seduce the then-governor of the Netherlands. Returning to the Opera, she challenged a man known for bothering female singers, and when he tried to refuse, she mugged him. Not wanting to admit to the embarrassment, he made up a story that he had been attacked, which she quickly refuted by producing a pocket watch she had taken from him. True Love And HeartbreakJulie was fated to die young. She fell for a mistress Marquise de Florensac, whose death after two years proved too much for the still-young Julie, who had finally found love at long last. Joining a convent for real this time, she lived there another few years until her death at the young age of 33. from https://www.bladespro.co.uk/blogs/news/the-notorious-bisexual-opera-duelist-of-paris-julie-daubigny From the mid-16th century to the 18th century, there lived in Europe three swordsmen whose skills were legendary. What makes these men remarkable is that their skill at dueling was the only commonality these men shared. They were each incredibly different in their temperaments, skills, and chosen paths in life.
Achille Marozzo—The Renaissance Fencing MasterThe first legend was Achille Marozzo, an Italian fencing master who followed the fencing tradition of the Bolognese school. He is remembered today for his treatise Opera Nova dell’Arte delle Armi, which mostly covers how to use various weapons or guards in tandem with a sword. Today, this work serves as a window into 16th century fencing styles and theory and is studied by many historical fencing groups. There is not much known about his personal life. What little we know about him comes mainly from his esteemed work. From lines such as “You must never attack without defending, nor defend without attacking” we can discern that he was a fairly calculating individual. We know he studied under Guido Antonio Di Luca, who trained a great many warriors. Marozzo became a teacher in his own right, as one contemporary noted that he “had trained an immense number of valiant disciplines.” Donald McBane—The Scottish Duelist ExtraordinaireDonald McBane was really a character. He was a womanizer and had the ability to get into trouble almost no matter what he did. Dueling for him was a double-edged sword – it got him into trouble as often as it got him out of it. If it weren’t for the fact that he was often well-liked by those above him, he would have been unlikely to have achieved as much as he did. Donald first learned swordsmanship when the elder soldier assigned to him regularly “dipped” into his wages. Donald paid for private instruction from a sergeant, then, as was the custom of the time, Donald challenged the elder soldier to a duel, which he then promptly lost. After taking more lessons, Donald, won the duel and became master of his and the other soldier’s wages. His exploits after this are too much to extol here, but suffice it to say, he had many adventures replete with scrapes, scuffles, and close calls. He did marry and had two kids, but his roving eye never stopped, and he consistently had many adventures with other women and became a brothel owner. Eventually, at the age of 63, he resolved to stop fighting and “repent of my former wickedness.”
Joseph Bologne, Chevalier de Saint-Georges—The Gentleman FencerPossibly the most interesting of the 3, Joseph Boulogne, better known as Saint George, was notable for being a half-African half-French aristocrat. Born the illegitimate son of a Frenchman and African slave, he was taken from his birthplace of Guadeloupe (an island in the Caribbean) to France at a young age. While his maternity disallowed him from being considered nobility, his father acknowledged and supported him throughout his life, an extreme rarity due to the racial divisions of the time. Saint George grew up with an excellent education, learning not only fencing but also horseback riding, literature, and science. Accounted a dashing man with a fierce prowess of the sword, he gained skill quickly, with one famed Italian fencer predicting that he would become the best fencer in Europe. Not skilled only with the sword, he also was an accomplished violinist. While not considered one of the great composers, one of the greats, Mozart, based a piece on a melody Saint George wrote. Saint George grew up with close ties to the Aristocracy. His father was very close to King Louis XV, and George himself developed a close friendship with Marie Antoinette. However, he developed sympathies for the growing revolutionary movement, though these ties made it difficult for the revolutionary leaders to trust him. As well as his involvement with the revolution, he also sympathized with the growing anti-slavery movement, which irritated slave owners. He lived to see slavery abolished but died soon before it was reimposed by Napoleon. from https://www.bladespro.co.uk/blogs/news/3-legendary-european-swordsmen One of the most famous leaders of all time, Genghis Khan led the Mongols on a conquest that would eventually form the largest contiguous empire in human history. All was not power and roses however, as he came from quite humble beginnings. A Child GroomThere is not much known about Genghis’s early life, though legends abound due to his later prominence. What is known is that he was born Temüjin, one of at least seven siblings. At the tender age of nine, his father arranged a marriage for him and took him to live with his bride’s family, a political ally, until he reached the marriageable age of twelve years. However, this questionably happy state of affairs was not to last, for, on the way home, his father met some enemies who poisoned him. Learning of this, the future conqueror left his bride-to-be and went home to his tribe in order to claim his father’s place as chief. The tribe rejected him, however, and he was forced with his family to flee and live of the land alone. Temüjin had an older half-brother Begter who began to seek power as he reached adulthood, and he planned to take Temüjin’s mother (not his own mother) as his wife. Temüjin resented Begter for this, and on a hunting excursion with his other brother Khasar, they killed Begter. A Rising StarTemüjin’s mother reportedly was a wise woman, who taught him about the need for political stability among the then-divided nomadic tribes of today’s Mongolia. This teaching combined with the harsh life of the open plains began to prepare Temüjin for his future role. Temüjin’s reputation began to increase when he was captured in a raid and later escaped. He eventually managed to complete the marriage his father had arranged, cementing the political alliance between the two tribes. His wife Börte was soon captured herself and given away to another man. Temüjin managed to rescue her with the help of his closest friend Jamukha and the soldiers of an ally. This capture would have historic repercussions, as Börte gave birth to a son nine months later, making it unclear who the father was. This would later complicate the matter of succession for the empire. While Genghis followed the tradition of taking multiple partners, only Börte and her children received any rights of inheritance. She bore him three more sons who would eventually become rulers in their own rights. Two Paths Divided, One ChosenTemüjin and Jamukha had each become Khan of their own tribes. Childhood friends, they had taken an oath to remain faithful to each other all their lives as blood brothers. However, their differences in governing philosophies began to cause a rift in their friendship. Temüjin favored a meritocratic method, and as such his ranks were filled with people of all classes. Jamukha followed the traditional path of aristocracy. When Temüjin was eventually elected as Khan of the Mongols, Jamukha successfully attacked him, driving him into a sort of exile. The historical records become unclear for the next decade, but eventually Temüjin was restored to power when he took part in an attack against people that had been oppressing his fellow tribesman. Temüjin continued to gain power by marriage, this time marrying his son to a daughter of Toghrul, an ally. However, Toghruls’s and Temüjin’s relationship was rocky at best, with Toghruls’s son Senggum unsuccessfully attacking Temüjin, and Toghrul refusing to give his daughter in marriage. This refusal led to war, with Toghrul teaming up with Jamukha against Temüjin. However due to previous atrocities committed by Jamukha, many soldiers deserted to Temüjin. This, combined with disagreements between Jamukha and Toghrul, led to their eventually defeat. Jamukha escaped to the Naimans, who eventually elected him leader. This caused another showdown with Temüjin ending in Jamukha’s defeat due to more desertions. This defeat made Temüjin the sole ruler of the Mongols, and he took the name Genghis Khan. The Mongol EmpireWith the clans united, Genghis began planning his empire. His first step was to invade the lands to the south. Correctly surmising that the Xia would not be aided by the ruler of what is now northern China, Genghis attacked. Though the conquest was successful, it was a hard one due to the Xia’s defenses. With the south quelled, Genghis turned his attention to the east, to the Jin who had not defended the Xia in their time of need. Noting the threat Genghis now posed, the Jin assembled their forces. However, due to a messenger’s defection, they lost the tactical advantage against Genghis and were defeated in a slaughter. This forced the ruler of the Jin to abandon modern Beijing and essential surrender the northern half of his realm to the Mongols. Two decades later, the remainder fell to the Mongols. The Mongols were tired after nearly a decade of fighting, so Genghis chose only a few soldiers to strike west. Using nefarious tactics, they managed to weaken the Qara Khitai before attacking directly and securing the Victory. Continuing west, they managed to secure territory all the way to the Caspian Sea. The empire kept expanding, eventually reaching India to the south, Iran to the west, Russia to the north, and Korea to the East. Succession and DeathGenghis managed to live to old age. However, the closer he got to death, the more troubled the empire became over who would succeed him. While, traditionally, his son Jochi should succeed, the question of his parentage and the refusal of one of Genghis’s sons Chagatai to support Jochi should he be named the successor made this choice untenable. Because of this refusal, Chagatai was also disconsidered, so Genghis chose his third son Ögedei as his successor. In order to further ease tensions, Genghis divided his empire into four Khanates and gave each to one of his sons. Jochi’s early death meant his Khanate was given to his two sons. When Genghis died, according to the custom of the time, he was buried in an unmarked grave. Ögedei continued expanding the empire after his father’s death, with the Mongol Empire eventually covering all modern-day China, as well as reaching Eastern Europe. The Sword Behind the Man.While it is uncertain exactly what weapon Genghis would have used on the battlefield, the Mongols used a type of slashing sword heavily related to the Chinese Dao. As their empire expanded, they adopted Persian weapons such as the Scimitar. from https://www.bladespro.co.uk/blogs/news/genghis-khan An Eastern CavalrymanZordun charged across the open plains on his horse. The wind blew in his face as he leaned down, urging a bit more speed from his mount. As he did so, he heard the soft whisper of hundreds of arrows whistling through the air above him. Barely managing to keep his eyes open against the dust stirred up from the sun-baked plains and the light of the noonday sun, he saw the arrows landing in the infantry in front of him, causing men to stumble and fall in cries of pain. He saw an answering rain of arrows rise up from behind the men and whistle past him, landing in some of the men unfortunate enough to ride slower than him. Sending up a silent prayer of thanks for his swift ride, he slowed his horse slightly and raised his Scimitar, primed for battle. Featured Sword: ScimitarScimitars and Katanas may seem similar at first glance - they are curved, Eastern swords developed near a thousand years ago. However, that is where their similarities end. The first main difference lies in the forging process. Scimitars are typically not forge welded like Katanas (heated, then welded to itself), they are beaten into shape blow by blow. Thus they are made already curved - the shape provided by the smith at creation. However, Katanas are made straight and remain so until they are quenched, at which time the uneven cooling of the blade due to clay applied by the swordsmith causes the blade to curve. The second difference comes in their usage. The scimitar was developed primarily for use on horseback. The deep curve of the blade is excellent for slashing and making sure that the blade does not stick into its target - an excellent feature when riding by a target quickly. Katanas were made to be status symbols and to finish duels between two lightly armored opponents quickly - often in one or two strokes. A result of these different design choices are that Scimitars are worn with the edge down, while Katanas are worn with the edge facing up. Finally, scimitars are one-handed weapons whilst Katanas are two-handed. This means that the handle on a scimitar is much shorter than the Tsuka of a Katana. The main exceptions are scimitar swords made for executions (needing two hands) and certain Katana fighting styles (such as duel-wielding). Laying WasteSwerving left and right to avoid the blows of the men around him, Zordun skillfully guided his horse. Balancing carefully to remain upright, he skillfully slashed his blade at the nearest infantryman, causing a screen of pain and an arm to go limp. Steeling himself for the next blow, he struck at an armored opponent, the blade going deep and hitting bone, then glancing off. Knowing a straight sword would have likely stuck in the bone and risked pulling him off his horse into the thick of the battle, he again said a quick prayer of thanks. Fun FactsBritish officers began wearing mameluke swords after the Battle of Waterloo, especially by commanders of light cavalry and hussar units. Today, the current regulation sword for generals is a Maeluke sword. EtymologyThe word Scimitar comes from either Middle French cimeterre or Italian scimitarra, both of which probably originally came from an Ottoman Turkish word that itself descended from the Persian word shamshēr (شمشیر ) which literally means "paw claw". VariationsThere are many variations of Scimitars, each with their own name.
List credit of WikipediaSee our Swords > from https://www.bladespro.co.uk/blogs/news/scimitar |
ABOUT USBladesPro are pleased to provide an exciting and extensive range of quality Knives and Swords. We pride ourselves on our commitment to excellence and professionalism, putting our customers needs and wants at the center of all our decisions. Our knives and swords are sourced directly from the manufacturer and are shipped to you, cutting out the middle man and saving you money. Archives
October 2018
Categories |